2 Why did the British officer kill the elephant?
3 Why did the older and younger native men have opposite views on the killing?
“Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, tells the conflicts
and inner insecurities of a British colonial officer in a poor foreign country,
Moulmein Burma. The story begins with directly telling the readers how he is
hated by large numbers of people and the anti-European feelings were bitter. However,
the officer was secretly against the British and was for the natives. He could
never reveal that, because he knew he would never fit in with the Burmese
culture and could not betray his own country.
The British officer got a call
about an elephant on the loose that is “ravaging the bazaar,” his duty was to
capture and shoot the elephant. While trying to find the elephant, he struggled
making a decision if he should or should not kill the animal. Many of his
insecurities got the best of him when he faced the elephant. I think his
biggest insecurity was the huge crowd of the excited Burmese people. “But I did
not want to shoot the elephant” said the British officer, yet he knew everyone
would laugh at him for going all the way to the elephant with the rifle in his
hand. Then the officer said, “It was perfectly clear to me what I ought to do.”
This comes to my question; why did the British officer kill the elephant? I
believe he felt completely obligated and forced by the crowd of natives to
shoot the elephant, as he said, “pushed to and fro by the will of these yellow
faces.” The officer did not want to look like he could not do his job and then
have all the natives laugh and call him a coward. Also, he knew it was his duty
as an officer to kill the elephant even though he felt it was wrong. I believe
he felt really guilty at first killing the elephant, because it was minding its
own business eating in a field when he first came in contact with it. When he
ended up shooting the elephant it took him awhile to accept it. Soon enough it
gave him a sense of power as an officer, also showing that he was legally in
the right.
No comments:
Post a Comment